140 N.C. App. 71 - Kaminsky v. Sebile’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1072 · 10 U.S.C. § 1095 · 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Relies on Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hall · Williams v. Williams · State v. Hayes · Cates v. Wilson · 130 N.C. App. 616 - Heatherly v. Industrial Health Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder Cates , if a plaintiff recovers for the past Medicaid payments he or she received and the state fails to seek reimbursement, the plaintiff would not then be required to return the money to the defendant-tortfeasor”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hairston v. Harward“[s]imilarly, defendant here should not receive a windfall because the government abandoned its right under the [Federal Medical Care Recovery Act]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hairston v. Harward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.