Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 NEB 671 - Behrens v. State

Behrens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
5
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably State v. Burlison (1998), 73 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Martin (1968)

27 state decisions

801941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commercial National Bank of New Orleans v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Company · 119 Cal. App. 393 - People v. Rallo · Bainter v. Appel · People v. Ely · State ex rel. First National Bank v. Bartley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In construing a statute, the legislative intention is to be determined from a general consideration of the whole act with reference to the subject-matter to which it applies and the particular topic under which the language in question is found, and the intent as deduced from the whole will prevail over that of a particular part considered separately.’ 59 C. J. 993. “All parts of an act relating to the same subject should be considered together and not each by itself. “ ‘A word or phrase repeated in a statute will bear the same meaning throughout the statute, unless a different intention appears.’ 2 Lewis’ Sutherland, Statutory Construction (2d ed.) 758, sec. 399.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.