Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 N.H. 685 - State v. Guenzel

State v. Guenzel’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Michigan v. Long · United States v. Halper · Austin v. United States · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The double jeopardy clause of the New Hampshire Constitution protects against successive prosecutions for the same offense after acquittal or after conviction, and against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.