Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 NH 751 - State v. Russo

State v. Russo’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cote · State v. Plante · State v. Brinkman · State v. Letourneau · State v. Kimball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The scope and wording of jury instructions is generally within the sound discretion of the trial court, and any allegations of error will be evaluated by interpreting the disputed instructions in their entirety, as a reasonable juror would have understood them, and in light of all the evidence in the case. . . . [R]eversal of a jury verdict is unwarranted when a jury charge fairly covers the issues and law of a case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.