140 N.J. Super. 164 - State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2015
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Griffin v. California · Berger v. United States · Eisenstadt v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is clear in New Jersey that a defendant can be held as an aider or abettor only if he [or she] had the same criminal intent that must be possessed by the principal wrongdoer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“one cannot be held as an aider or abettor unless it is found that he shared the same intent required to be proved against the actual perpetrator”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must find a community of purpose between the actual perpetrator and the aider and abettor”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.