Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 NM 586 - State v. Gomez

State v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · County of Los Alamos v. Tapia · State v. Ahasteen · State v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any criminal proceeding in district court an appeal may be taken by the state to the [S]upreme [C]ourt or [C]ourt of [A]ppeals, as appellate jurisdiction may be vested by law in these courts ... within ten days from a decision or order of a district court suppressing or excluding evidence ..., if the district attorney certifies to the district court that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “ma[k]e it impossible for the State to prove an element of its case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “make it impossible for the State to prove the elements of its case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.