140 Ohio App. 3d 402 - In Re Spradlin’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably 160 Ohio App. 3d 159 - In Re Slider (2005), 142 Ohio App. 3d 16 - In Re Smith (2001)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 123 Ohio App. 3d 448 - In Re Sappington · 119 Ohio App. 3d 201 - In Re Howard · 77 Ohio App. 3d 80 - In Re Adoption of Howell · 61 Ohio App. 3d 763 - In Re Nation · 54 Ohio App. 2d 137 - In Re Christopher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1.] The trial court committed reversible error when it failed to appoint a guardian ad litem in violation of Ohio Revised Code Section 2151.281 (a) and Juvenile Rule 4(B). {¶ 13}”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he court finds that there is a conflict of interest between the child and the child's parent . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the interests of a child or incompetent adult in a juvenile court proceeding when: {¶ 21} "* * * {¶ 22} "(2) The interests of the child and the interests of the parent may conflict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.