140 Ohio App. 3d 466 - State v. Burrow’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a firearm loaded or with ammunition ready at hand”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Woullard, Unpublished Decision (6-25-2004) · State v. Boykin, Unpublished Decision (4-2-2004)

2. “The verdict form, however, did not incorporate the language of the indictment. Neither did it contain the degree of the offense or the additional element making the offense one of a more serious degree. Moreover, while the trial court read the indictment to the jury, it did not further instruct the jury on the additional”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Woullard, Unpublished Decision (6-25-2004)