140 Ohio App. 3d 75 - State v. Shoaf’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably State v. Massien (2010), 156 Ohio App. 3d 177 - State v. Turner (2004)
57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 66 Ohio App. 3d 278 - State v. Gadd · 131 Ohio App. 3d 507 - State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the legislature made a determination that when chemical abuse is the cause or at least a precipitating factor in the commission of a crime, it may be more beneficial to the individual and the community as a whole to treat the cause rather than punish the crime.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“(D) If the court grants an offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction, the court shall place the offender under the general control and supervision of the county probation department, the adult parole authority, or another appropriate local probation or court services agency, if one exists, as if the offender was subject to a community control sanction imposed under section 2929.15 , 2929.18 , or 2929.25 of the Revised Code. The court shall establish an intervention plan for the offender. The terms and conditions of the intervention plan shall require the offender, for at least one year from the date on which the court grants the order of intervention in lieu of conviction, to abstain from the use of illegal drugs and alcohol and to submit to regular random testing for drug and alcohol use and may include any other treatment terms and conditions, or terms and conditions similar to community control sanctions, that are ordered by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for a period of rehabilitation not to exceed three years. As appellant correctly points out, at the time of appellant's offense and his initial motion for TLC, R.C. 2951.041 also stated that upon a finding that a defendant had violated the terms of the TLC, a trial court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.