Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Ohio App. 3d 81 - State v. Smith

140 Ohio App. 3d 81 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably S. Euclid v. Njoku (2022), State v. Irish (2019)

26 state decisions

140200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Pachay · 13 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Geraldo · State v. Pudlock · State v. Bauer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strict enforcement has been grounded in the conclusion that the speedy trial statutes implement the constitutional guarantee of a public speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “except that for good cause shown in open court, with the prisoner or his counsel present, the court may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “R.C. 2941.401 is mandatory and must be strictly complied with by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.