Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Ohio St. 80 - Jenkins v. Sharp

140 Ohio St. 80 - Jenkins v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
5
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 1977 · most notably Hawkins v. Ivy (1977), Rodney v. Staman (1952)

8 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1401942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The word ‘disposition’ as used is used in the sense of mental state, mental inclination or tendency. “By ‘perversity’ is meant the quality of being perverse, that is, stubborn, obstinate, cantankerous, contrary, not disposed to be set right, wilfully erring, peevish. “Taken together the expression ‘disposition to perversity’ is such a disposition or mental state as is manifested or shown by a person, who when notwithstanding his or her conscious and timely knowledge of an approach to an unusual danger, and of common probability of injury to others, proceeds into the presence of the danger with indifference to consequences and with absence of all care.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is evidence . . . that a defendant in operating his automobile approaches a dangerous highway crossing, along which his view is obstructed, and, with conscious and timely knowledge of the existence of a stop signal [to which defendant himself testified], marking the intersecting highway as a main thoroughfare, drives on at a high and dangerous speed and in disregard of the injunction to stop. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “facts show an unusually dangerous situation and a consciousness on the part of the driver that his conduct will in common probability result in injury to another,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.