Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Or. 200

13 P.2d 609

State v. Foster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1932

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1932-07-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1946

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-07-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1IN BANC. Ralph Foster was convicted of larceny of livestock, and he appeals. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

¶2APPEAL DISMISSED. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for the crime of larceny of livestock and served notice of appeal. The district attorney filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not perfected in accordance with the statute, but the motion to dismiss the appeal does not appear to have been served upon defendant.

¶3Section 13-1221, Oregon Code 1930, provides in a criminal action, if the appeal be irregular in a substantial *201 particular, but not otherwise, the appellate court may, on motion of the respondent and notice to the defendant, order it to be dismissed.

¶4The motion to dismiss, not being entitled to consideration, is denied.

/140/or/200 · .json · Public domain