Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Or. App. 114 - Ensign v. Marion County

140 Or. App. 114 - Ensign v. Marion County’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2024

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt · Maddox v. City of Los Angeles · Benitez-Allende v. Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S.A. · Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Bell Helicopters Textron · 601 F. Supp. 66 - Westmoreland v. CBS INC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 407 prohibits evidence of “measures” that have been “taken.” We take “measures” to mean concrete actions, and to leave outside the rule’s prohibition preliminary investigations and recommendations pointing toward those actions. Even if post-accident investigations and. reports were considered “measures,” the rule would not reach them. The rule excludes “subsequent measures” that would have reduced the likelihood of the accident if they had been “taken previously,” meaning before the accident. “One cannot investigate an accident before it occurs, so an investigation and report ... cannot be a measure that is excluded.” The language of Rule 407 and the general presumption of admissibility laid down by Rule 402, along with persuasive authority from other courts, compel us to hold that evidence of post-accident investigations and recommendations are not automatically excluded as subsequent remedial measures. •”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.