140 Or. App. 507 - State v. Park’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"(1) The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. "(2) By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of subsection (1) of this section: "(a) Testimony by a witness with knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be. "***** "(d) Appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns or other distinctive characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances. "(e) Identification of a voice, whether heard first-hand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker. "(f) Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business ***: "***** "(g) Evidence that a writing authorized by law to be recorded or filed and in fact recorded or filed in a public office, or a purported public record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, is from the public office where items of this nature are kept."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 292 Or. App. 248 - State v. Noorzai