People v. Isom’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably People v. Welsh (2007), People v. Munsey (2009)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Michael MILLER · Hill v. DeWitt · Leonardo v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, due process does not require the defendant's presence when it would be useless or only slightly beneficial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“There is no right of confrontation or hearsay preclusion when statements are offered, not for their truth, but to provide context for the declarant's statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Banks“a statement other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.