140 Pa. Commw. 252 - Millick v. Millick’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Klusman v. Bucks County Court of Common Pleas · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. Magaziner · Young v. Young · Commonwealth v. Alessi · 396 Pa. Super. 166 - Graham v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While original jurisdiction over official acts of the Commonwealth or its officers usually rests with this court, 42 Pa.C.S. §761 does not envision that this court would have jurisdiction over matters the Commonwealth or its agencies are only incidentally involved with no interest in the outcome of the underlying action. Original jurisdiction by this court normally only exists where the Commonwealth or one of its agencies is a party to the action and its rights are directly affected. Of course, even if the Commonwealth or one of its agencies rights are only incidentally affected, it would be within this court’s appellate jurisdiction to review the trial court’s actions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fender v. Trapuzzano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.