Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Pa. Commw. 317 - McCallum v. Commonwealth

140 Pa. Commw. 317 - McCallum v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2016

19 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELL · 26 Pa. Commw. 201 - Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Dreisbach · 103 Pa. Commw. 148 - Waldspurger v. Commonwealth · 121 Pa. Commw. 464 - Menosky v. Commonwealth · 107 Pa. Commw. 213 - Commonwealth v. Mulholland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a reasonable person in the position of a police officer, viewing the facts and circumstances as they appeared to the officer at the time, could conclude that the driver drove his car while under the influence of alcohol.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Reasonable grounds’ does not require a police officer to witness the driver driving his car. In addition, the police officer's reasonable grounds will not be rendered void if the belief is later discovered to be erroneous. The police officer's belief must only be objective in light of the surrounding circumstances, and ‘the existence of reasonable alternative conclusions does not necessarily preclude [the arresting officer’s] actual belief from being reasonable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.