Lamy v. Will’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bagneris v. Smoot · 10 La. App. 230 - Clemons v. Succession of Johnson · Martin v. Seabaugh · 99 So. 2d 841 - Domino v. La Bord · Brand v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order for plaintiff to recover he must occupy a role equivalent to that of an innocent bystander, i.e., he must have been wholly unconnected with the gambling activity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Deblieux v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.