¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
¶2h The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in a consensual sexual relationship with a client. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rules 1.7, 2.1, and 8.4(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,
¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that William F. Kendig, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 17644, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, with all but six months deferred, followed by a two-year period of unsupervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred portion of the suspension execu-tory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.
¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.