Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 So. 3d 691

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-06-11

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2018

3 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · 850 So. 2d 1265 - Ashley v. State · Knight v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-06-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences in this Anders1 appeal, but remand for correction of the written judgment and the probationary order, which reflect that the trial court sentenced the appellant to 15 years’ imprisonment to be followed by 10 years’ probation for the second-degree felony of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon/actual possession. The sentencing hearing transcript indicates that the trial court orally imposed a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment for this offense, but no probation. It is a longstanding principle that a court’s oral pronouncement controls over any written sentencing document. State v. Williams, 870 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003)). The appellant does not need to be present for the correction of this clerical error. See Knight v. State, 114 So.3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

¶2AFFIRMED but REMANDED to correct the written sentence in the judgment and probationary order to reflect a 15-year prison sentence as to Count I.

BENTON, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/140/so3d/691 · .json · Public domain