Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 S.W.3d 901 - Marsh v. State

Marsh v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 337th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Guzman v. State · Romero v. State · Carmouche v. State · Wesbrook v. State · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The juvenile court may designate an office or a room, which may be located in a police facility or sheriff's offices, as the juvenile processing office for the temporary detention of a child taken into custody under Section 52.01 [4] . The office may not be a cell or holding facility used for detentions other than detentions under this section. The juvenile board by written order may prescribe the conditions of the designation and limit the activities that may occur in the office during the temporary detention. (b) A child may be detained in a juvenile processing office only for: (1) the return of the child to the custody of a [parent or guardian] ...; (2) the completion of essential forms and records required by the juvenile court or this title; (3) the photographing and fingerprinting of the child ...; (4) the issuance of warnings to the child as required or permitted by this title; or (5) the receipt of a statement by the child under Section 51.095(a)(1), (2), (3), or (5). (c) A child may not be left unattended in a juvenile processing office and is entitled to be accompanied by the child's parent, guardian or by the child's attorney. (d) A child may not be detained in a juvenile processing office for longer than six hours.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “dictating the necessary procedures for taking the child's statement, are violated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re DJC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.