140 Tex. Crim. 387 - Roe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1980
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 98 Tex. Crim. 485 - Segal v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We desire to make it clear that under some circumstances the offense of theft would be complete although the owner of the property parts with both the title and possession thereof, if he is induced to do so by some false pretext, and the other elements are present which constitute the offense. One reason is that the false pretext may be such that it involves future happenings and would not support a swindling charge. Illustrative, see Contreras v. State, 118 Tex. Cr. R. 626 , 39 S. W. 2d 62 ; White v. State, 123 Tex. Cr. R. 282 , 58 S. W. 2d 530 ; Sherman v. State, 124 Tex. Cr. R. 273 , 62 S. W. 2d 146 ; Hoovel v. State, 125 Tex. Cr. R. 545 , 69 S. W. 2d 104 ; Haley v. State, 127 Tex. Cr. R. 177 , 75 S. W. 2d 272 , Baldwin v. State, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 427 ; 104 S. W. 2d 872 ; Lovine v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 32 , 122 S. W. 2d 1069 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.