Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 U.S. 106 - Scott v. Neely

Scott v. Neely’s Empirical Analysis

140 U.S. 106 · 1891

Citation profile

700
cited by 700 later decisions
75
cited 75 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

262 federal appellate · 88 district · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 700 later decisions (75 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc, Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover (1959)

262 federal appellate · 88 district · 65 state decisions — followed in 21 states

115018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitehead v. Shattuck · Holland v. Challen · Case of Broderick's Will · Buzard v. Houston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 700 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[jury] right cannot ... be impaired by any blending with a claim, properly cognizable at law, of a demand for equitable relief in aid of the legal action or during its pendency'”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In all cases where a court of equity interferes to aid the enforcement of a remedy at law, there must be an acknowledged debt, or one established by a judgment rendered, accompanied by a right to the appropriation of the property ol' the debtor for its payment, or, to speak with greater accuracy, there must be, in addition to such acknowledged or established debt, an interest in the property or a lion thereon created by contract or by some distinct legal proceeding.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It has been often adjudged that whenever, respecting any right violated, a court of law is competent to render a judgment affording a plain, adequate, and complete remedy, the party aggrieved must seek his remedy in such court, not only because the defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury, but because of the prohibition of the act of Congress to pursue his remedy in such cases in a court of equity.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.