Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 U.S. 213 - Dwight v. Merritt

Dwight v. Merritt’s Empirical Analysis

140 U.S. 213 · 1891

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1999 · most notably United States v. Bernard Citroen (1912), United States v. O'Neil (1993)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

11018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Worthington v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Revised Statutes are not a mere compilation and consolidation of the laws of Congress in force on the 1st of December, 1873. The object of that revision was to simplify and bring together all statutes and parts of statutes which, from similarity of subject, ought to be brought together, to expunge redundant and obsolete enactments, and to make such alterations as might be necessary to reconcile contradictions and amend imperfections in the original text of the pre-existing statutes. All those statutes were abrogated bisection 5596, which provides that ‘all acts of Congress passed prior to said first day of December, one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three, any portion of which is embraced in any section of said revision, are hereby repealed, and the section applicable thereto shall be in force in lieu thereof.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.