Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Wash. 206

248 P 419

Cartwright v. Kulzer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1926

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1926-08-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-08-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2014

5 state decisions

201926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Tolman, C. J.

¶1 (dissenting) — While I am in sympathy with the results reached by the majority, still I am unable to concur in the opinion. It seems to me that our previous cases looking toward a contrary result have not been, by the majority, successfully distinguished, and moreover I am unalterably opposed to the adoption *212 of one r.ule. for natural persons and a'contrary rule for corporations, so that in actual effect corporations are granted privileges and immunities which are denied to natural persons. The whole subject should have been re-examined and a just rule laid down to be applied alike to all persons natural and artificial.

¶2 I therefore dissent.

¶3 Mackintosh, J., concurs with Tolman, O. J.

/140/wash/206 · .json · Public domain