State v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · State v. Brown · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 122 Wash. 2d 270 - State v. Valdobinos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] document charging conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance must allege that persons involved outside the act of delivery took part in the conspiracy agreement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McCarty · State v. Borrero“[s]urely to ensure due process, the notice of the charge on which a defendant will be tried most logically be given at some point prior to the opening statement of the trial!”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the necessary elements are not found or fairly implied, however, we presume prejudice and reverse without reaching the question of prejudice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goodman · State v. McGary
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.