140 Wis. 2d 224 - C.L. v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[glovernmental immunity does not attach to a parole agent's decision merely because it involves discretion. The question is whether the decision involved the type of judgment and discretion which rises to governmental discretion, as opposed to professional or technical judgment and discretion.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 200 Wis. 2d 1 - Kimps v. Hill · 164 Wis. 2d 420 - Sheridan v. City of Janesville

2. “methodology does not allow enlargement of the issues beyond those framed by the pleadings. Were the rule otherwise, plaintiffs affidavit opposing a defendant's motion for summary judgment would itself constitute a complaint which must be answered and require a new motion for summary judgment.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 211 Wis. 2d 312 - Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee · 210 Wis. 2d 62 - Banc One Building Management Corp. v. W.R. Grace Co.

3. “[o]btain advance permission from an agent to purchase, trade, sell, or operate a motor vehicle.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 143 Wis. 2d 701 - C.L. v. Olson