Congel v. Malfitano’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Here, as in Anastos , the partnership remains a going concern, and the defendant has no right to compel a liquidation sale of the partnership's shopping mall and receive a proportionate share of the liquidation value of that asset. Under these circumstances, a minority discount may properly be applied to account for the defendant's lack of control in the partnership as a going concern." ( 141 A.D.3d at 74 -75 , 32 N.Y.S.3d 264 .)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Congel v. Malfitano

2. “[t]he facts of Gelman , involving an alleged oral partnership agreement which lacked a definite term of duration, are plainly distinguishable from the facts of this case. In contrast to Gelman , the written partnership agreement here specified that the partnership would continue until terminated by a majority vote of the partners, and was thus not dissolvable at will by a single partner”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Congel v. Malfitano

3. “this case ... involves the determination of the 'value' of the shares of a partner who has wrongfully caused the dissolution of a partnership pursuant to Partnership Law § 69 (2) (c) (II)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Congel v. Malfitano