Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

141 Ala. 516

Stewart v. Paul

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1904

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1904-11-15

<p> Petition for Habeas Corpus. </p> <p>1. Appeal from order of probate judge as to custody of child. — Under statutory provisions (Code, § 457) an appeal will lie to the Supreme Court from the order of the judge of probate, awarding the custody of a child to the petitioner, who had filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to have the custody of the child taken from the respondent.</p> <p>2. Same; appeal bond necessary. — In such a case, the party appealing is required to give security for costs, and failing so to do, the appeal will be dismissed.</p>

Relies on Shows v. Pendry

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1946

6 state decisions

4019041910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOWDELL, J.

¶1The appellee filed a petition to the judge of probate for a writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that her child, ten years old, was illegally held by the appellant. On this petition a hearing was had before the judge, and upon such hearing a judgment was *517rendered according the custody of the child to the petitioner, and further adjudging the costs against the appellant, and from this judgment or order the present appeal Avas taken. The judgment or order Aims such, from which, either party under the statute might prosecute an appeal. — Code 1896, § 457, (same as § 3640, Cede 1886; Shows v. Pendry, 93 Ala. 248. This proceeding, the party'restrained not being held under any criminal charge, • is in its nature a civil proceding. The party appealing is under the statute, (§ 439 of the Code, 1896), required to give security for costs, and failing to do so, the appeal cannot be sustained. No security for costs of appeal Avas given- in this case, and it follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

¶2Appeal dismissed.

McCbellaN, C. J., HaralroN and Dewson, JJ., concurring.
/141/ala/516 · .json · Public domain