Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Ariz. 167 - Fleming v. Pima County

Fleming v. Pima County’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · 18 Cal. 3d 808 - Miller v. State of California · Larsen v. Motor Supply Co. · City of San Antonio v. Wallace · City of Phoenix v. Mayfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person having a claim against a county shall, within six months after the last item of the account accrues, present to the Board of Supervisors ... a written itemized claim____ The Board shall not consider a claim unless the demand therefor is presented within such time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"While it is true that the terms and conditions of employment are fixed by statute, or rules and regulations creating it and not by contract, the relationship between the employee and the county is nevertheless in the nature of a contract."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “did not arise out of contract, express or implied, but rather that its relationship to a civil service employee is the product of statutory law and the constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.