Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Colo. 419 - Gabe v. FORGES

Gabe v. FORGES’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reilly v. Korholz · McWilliams v. Bolster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At the risk of appearing dreary and trite, we reiter ate our uniform pronouncement that findings of fact made by the trier of facts, court or jury, will not be disturbed if supported by credible testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.