Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.1d 5 - Ex parte Dick

Ex parte Dick’s Empirical Analysis

141 F. 5 · 1905

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 1912
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Lone Wolf v. Ethan a Hitchcock · In re Heff · United States v. Dewitt · In the Matter of the Application of Albert Heff for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is further agreed that the lands by this agreement ceded, those retained, and those allotted to the said Nez Perce Indians, shall be subject, for a period of twenty-five years, to all the laws of the' United States prohibiting the introduction of intoxicants into the Indian country, and that'the Nez Perce Indian allottees, whether under the care of an Indian agent or not, shall, for a like period, be subject to all the laws of the United States prohibiting the sale or other disposition of intoxicants to Indians.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We do not think that Congress can reserve or exercise such police power within the territorial limits of a state. The iioliee power of the United States can only be exercised where the legislative authority of Congress excludes territorially all state legislation. United States v. De Witt, 9 Wall. 41 , 45, 19 L. Ed. 593 ; Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wall. 36 , 64, 21 L. Ed. 394 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.