Allen v. Luke’s Empirical Analysis
141 F. 694 · 1906
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 1929
most recently cited
7 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Briggs v. Spaulding · Boyd v. Schneider · Stephens v. Overstolz · Price v. Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A receiver of a national bank may maintain a suit against the directors in behalf of creditors and stockholders to recover sums alleged to have been lost to the bank through the misconduct or' negligence of defendants, and it is not a necessary condition precedent that violations of the banking act should have been previously adjudged in a suit brought by the comptroller. * * * A cause of action against a director of a national bank to recover for money lost to the bank through his negligence or misconduct survives against his executors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curtis v. Phelps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.