Bramblet v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
141 F. 776 · 1905
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1956
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor · Charles Williamson and Catharine His Wife v. Joseph Berry · Suydam v. Williamson · Preston's Heirs v. Bowmar · Den Ex Dem. Harry v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the circumstances, we must hold that whether the location of the Ledford patent involved in Creech v. Johnson ought to have been heard and adjudicated was one for the Court of Appeals to pass upon, and, since it entertained .jurisdiction and delivered a considered opinion, which appears in tiie reports of the court prepared for publication, we must accept its conclusions as its deliberate judgment upon the location of the patent, entitled to the weight such judgments usually are.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rowe v. Kidd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.