Mackenzie v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis
141 F. 964 · 1905
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2019
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Taintor · Wales v. Whitney · in the Matter of the Application of Ramon Baez · Cosgrove v. Winney · Cheong Ah Moy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ne under arrest, but at large on bail, is entitled to a writ the same as if the arrest was accompanied by actual imprisonment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one under arrest, but at large on bail is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus, the same as if the arrest was accompanied by actual imprisonment;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowland v. Arkansas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.