Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.2d 727 - Pope v. Huff

Pope v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

141 F.2d 727 · 1944

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2000 · most notably Dorsey v. Gill (1945), Dorsey v. Gill (1945)

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1401944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNally v. Hill · Waley v. Johnston · Salinger v. Loisel · Wong Doo v. United States · Neufield v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Though the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to habeas corpus proceedings, the fact that the same issues have been decided in a former proceeding may, and sometimes should, as a matter of judicial discretion, be given controlling weight. * * *'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.