Calhoun v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
141 F.2d 729 · 1944
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1989
6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. Smith · Labofish v. Berman · Sprouse v. Mages · McCartney v. Holmquist · Gorman v. Hickey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the decedent for purposes of § 14-307, nor did it offer any citations or other authority in support of its assertion. Over the years, the rule in Hutchins has been called seriously into question. First, it has now been clearly established that where the heirs stand in the patient's shoes and there is no controversy between the executor and the heirs, the united heirs are the patient's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“permitted to exercise the patient's privilege of waiver in order to enforce a substantive right which descended from the patient to his heirs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.