Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

141 F.3d 1168

Docket No. 97-3006MN.

Huls v. Davis

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 11, 1998. Filed Feb. 11, 1998.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1998-02-11

Relies on Hawley v. Nelson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1998-02-11

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Kenneth J. Huls appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Huls's action attacking the constitutionality of a state rule that requires six years of documented alcohol abstinence before a motorist involved in three alcoholic-related traffic violations is eligible for reinstatement of driving privileges. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude that Huls has failed to show a protected property interest or a violation of his constitutional rights. We affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶2

Huls's motion for an expedited decision is granted.

¶3

A true copy.

/141/f3d/1168 · .json · Public domain