Castillo v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
141 F.3d 218 · 1998
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Hall (1998), Moore v. Johnson (1999)
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Lindh v. Murphy · Darden v. Wainwright · Barefoot v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Brady , the prosecution has no obligation to produce evidence or information already known to the defendant, or that could be obtained through the defendant's exercise of reasonable diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Castillo's claim challenging the exclusion of evidence based on state law thus does not afford a basis for federal habeas corpus relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mayabb v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.