Stoops v. One Call Communications, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
141 F.3d 309 · 1998
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Burnett v. LFW Inc. (2006), Karen Horwitz v. Board of Education of Avoca School District (2001)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Manuel v. Westlake Polymers Corp. · Price v. City of Fort Wayne · Price v. Marathon Cheese Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“medical evidence should come from the employee in time to save his job, not during a subsequent lawsuit.”). 5 . Alternatively, Taylor argues that Ameritech violated the FMLA by refusing to allow him to retroactively use vacation to cover his absence when his request for FMLA leave was denied. Taylor supports his novel theory that denial of vacation time is a cognizable claim under the FMLA by citing to 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (a)(1). However, Section 2516(a)(1) merely states that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“employee can be completely ignorant of the benefits conferred by the Act: it is sufficient notice if the employee provides the employer with enough information to put the employer on notice that FMLA-qualifying leave is needed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“nothing in the Act or regulations limits the employee's ability to produce a medical opinion that contradicts a prior negative certification originally provided by the employee.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.