Morelli v. Cedel’s Empirical Analysis
141 F.3d 39 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. (2002), Soo Cheol Kang v. U. Lim America, Inc. (2002)
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Lorillard v. Pons · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Tomka v. Seiler Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no requirement than an employee be protected by the ADEA to be counted.... The nose count of the employees relates to the scale of the employer rather than to the extent of the protection.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the burdens of compliance and potential litigation costs, `the protection of intimate and personal relations existing in small businesses, potential effects on competition and the economy, and the constitutionality of Title VII under the Commerce Clause.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At a minimum, this provision means that the ADEA does not apply to the foreign operations of foreign employers — unless there is an American employer behind the scenes.”); Denty v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 109 F.3d 147, 150-50 (3d Cir.1997) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.