Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.3d 425 - Gutierrez v. Fox

Gutierrez v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

141 F.3d 425 · 1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2017

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · Tcherepnin v. Knight · Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York · Oliveri v. Thompson · Mitchell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it misconceives the purpose of [the] hallowed [Desmare] presumption, which, unlike evidentiary presumptions, is premised not on probabilities or on which party has more ready access to pertinent information, but rather on a judicial policy determination that in ascertaining diversity jurisdiction in a highly mobile society there is a need to fix domicile with some reasonable certainty at the threshold of litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]s a corollary to this presumption, the person alleging a change of domicile [in connection with ascertaining diversity] has the burden of proving it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affirmative duty on each attorney to conduct a reasonable inquiry into the viability of a pleading before it is signed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.