Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.3d 635 - Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources’s Empirical Analysis

141 F.3d 635 · 1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn Campbell (1999), Granzeier v. Middleton (1999)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn. · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Winters v. United States · United States v. Lineas Winans · Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not in any way, limit the means by which fish were to be taken from the lakes or restrict the treaty fishers to using technology that was in existence at the time of the treaty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]here simply is no material dispute of fact that [tribal] fishers reasonably require the ability to occasionally moor their vessels at [the municipal marinas].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be construed to preserve the position for which the parties bargained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.