Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.3d 751 - Cowan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Cowan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America’s Empirical Analysis

141 F.3d 751 · 1998

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Rogers v. City of Chicago (2003), Moser v. Indiana Department of Corrections (2005)

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

280199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Russell v. Acme-Evans Co. · Baskerville v. Culligan International Co. · Collins v. State · Brooms v. Regal Tube Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] deposition is the time for the plaintiff to make a record capable of surviving summary judgment — not a later filed affidavit”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In support of her [hostile work environment] claim, [the plaintiff] points to other incidents where male employees allegedly were treated better than female employees. For instance, [the plaintiff] claims that her supervisor continued to work more intensively with a new employee than he did with her. If adequately supported, such disparate treatment could constitute a claim of outright discrimination-not a hostile work environment claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.