Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 F.3d 976 - Miller v. Marr

Miller v. Marr’s Empirical Analysis

141 F.3d 976 · 1998

Citation profile

398
cited by 398 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 398 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Holland v. Florida (2010), Holland v. Florida (2010)

63 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

28701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Schlup v. Delo · United States v. Hayman · Felker v. Turpin · Cooper v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 398 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “begins to run in accordance with individual circumstances that could reasonably affect the availability of the remedy, ... but requires inmates to diligently pursue claims.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]here may be circumstances where the limitation period at least raises serious constitutional questions and possibly renders the habeas remedy inadequate and ineffective,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is not enough to say that the ... prison facility lacked all relevant statutes and case law or that the procedure to request specific materials was inadequate”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.