¶1 Cathy Little appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for Appellee on some claims, and implementing the jury’s verdict on other claims, in this action arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e — 2000e-17 (2000), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord *174 ingly, we affirm based on the jury’s verdict and for the reasons stated by the district court. See Little v. Potter, No. CA-03-3403-MJG (D.Md. Mar. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED