Tapogna v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Thomas v. Arn · Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What is the source of this [negative] information? What is the reason for believing that it is true? What is the factual basis for stating that, if true, the defendants both knew of this information and knew it to be true at the time they made the statements?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.