Davila v. Arlasky’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2017
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Frates v. Weinshienk · 64 Ill. 2d 187 - Maryland Casualty Co. v. Peppers · 74 Ill. 2d 132 - Thornton v. Paul · McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a close examination of the facts is more helpful to determine whether there is a sufficient interest for 24(a) intervention than categorizing is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross“is often used as a proxy for evaluating the importance of the interest and the likelihood that it could be impaired,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.