141 F. Supp. 2d 35 - Brodetski v. Duffey’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
37 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 290 F. Supp. 2d 11 - Lester v. Natsios (2003), 293 F. Supp. 2d 135 - Buggs v. Powell (2003)
37 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Foman v. Davis · Haines v. Kerner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sexual harassment claim [was] untimely....” Def. Ex. 17. 3 . WMATA also argues that Keys’ discrimination claims arising out of her 1996 and 1999 charges are untimely because she did not file an individual action following the Bansal action. Because the Court has determined that Keys waived any discrimination, claims based on discrete acts alleged in the 1996 and 1999 EEOC complaint, it need not address this argument. 4 . Absent direct evidence establishing the causal connection, “[a] causal connection may be inferred by showing that the employer had knowledge of the employee's protected activity, and that the adverse personnel action took place shortly after that activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While courts have not definitively 'established the maximum time lapse between protected Title VII activity and alleged retaliatory actions,' action which occurs more than three months after the protected activity is not likely to qualify for such a causal inference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“this is the level of personnel decision-making in which courts should not meddle,” and it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.