Hispanic Affairs Project v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mazurek v. Armstrong · Wisconsin Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England · Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he D.C. Circuit has found that a delay of even forty-four days before bringing action” was “inexcusable,” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bronner v. Duggan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.